1.
AD 30 subtracted from AD 1948 leaves 1918 years, nothing about this seems relational either except any equivalence would have to be in thousands of years, which means approximately two millennial measurements
2.
Here is a simple program, which demonstrates the use of if and the relational operators
3.
out another thought, attentional mass is a relational property between
4.
There are so many denominational, relational, and doctrinal divisions in the church right now
5.
God is a real person who thinks in relational ways
6.
Relational referrals come from fixing a problem or satisfying needs known and unknown
7.
Relational referrals have and will continue to scale with enormous influence, one-to-one to millions, and that influence can create or shift entire markets at the click of a mouse
8.
The Socialutions answers for improving relational sales requires a different way of thinking
9.
the physical and relational context is made invisible
10.
female relational style as psychologically superior or more functional for the needs of
11.
and, if so, why? A relational orientation is not just one thing consistently fueled by the same forces and the same consequences, but differs situationally and motivationally in
12.
more relational, empathic, and interpersonally connected, while men are considered to
13.
relational capacity? Or would girls become more like boys? Would these changes
14.
relational capacities and emphasis, it is imperative to view this and any attribute
15.
needs of others, then it would appear that women, in general, are more relational than
16.
evident that compared to women, men are not less, but differently, relational in
17.
way that mothers are, but men are also relational in ways that strongly resemble the
18.
consistently different relational orientations in the female and male children of these
19.
) Even if the relational difference were true for middle-dass white women and men in the
20.
still remains in the relational realm, in relationship with men and children, that is
21.
relational and empathic but females should have more need to separare and should be
22.
that to be more relational is also to be safer, to be protected
23.
willlead to a balance between the genders in relational orientation
24.
Jordan, and Janet Surrey (1986), have spoken of the female relational self or self-in-
25.
Their task became the struggle, late in life, to develop a more posítive and less relational sense of self
26.
leads to an overriding emphasis on relational aspects of life and, frequently, mild to
27.
relational database groups of data are stored /
28.
In effect, the absolute size of the cost of capital is less important than its relational value and its context
29.
immediate changes in the cost of capital, but can be used as proxy in other relational values such as the financial leverage ratio and the TIE (times interest earned)
30.
capital structure analysis, those relational value always provide a solid foundation over the long-term, because a firm cannot be in business without adhering to them
31.
pinpointing an absolute minimum cost of capital, several relational variables allow the
32.
risk, he or she steps out of the realm of relational fundamentals and uses statistical
33.
Any relational statistic between the two sub populations such as the amount
34.
Over the years and particularly now, it's a lot easier because I've got very strong prophetic people around me, and I've got a relational team where we can talk openly about things, but hidden agendas don't ever - they're not really a big problem now, because the prophetic people around me can spot them a mile off, just speak, hey, this is what's going on there, so that's wonderful
35.
· There was spiritual and relational drought
36.
The self is not only spacial, inhabiting relational zones, but also temporal
37.
” A jaded thirties marinated in its many relational betrayals of promises given and the promised taken back
38.
But what is crucial to understanding the present relational dynamic between tools and us; is how tools first changed our ancestor’s social dynamic from what it was, to what it is today
39.
After death we can no more fall-back because death brings an end to that relational gap between God and individual that holds the beatitude of falling back onto God
40.
These weaknesses may be physical, emotional, mental, sexual, relational, genetic, etc
41.
Indeed, a rationale from the evidence of creation created by the mystical relational love of a ‘God’ that human and their hearts, minds and soul so desired to believe, predicated on human innate spirituality
42.
God’s actual words spoken through Christ, are perhaps hidden and camouflaged through inspired human words that attempt to describe the true story of the Creator’s mystical relational love
43.
We read stories in the New Testament about the good news for humankind and about God’s unconditional mystical relational love for humankind
44.
We read about the teachings and commandments of Christ and about ‘God’s’ new laws of relational love, charity, hope and compassion
45.
We also read verses that contradict and are incongruent to this new message of relational love, providing further evidence for the need for cautious interpretation as being the words articulated by human experience and thus human interpretation to a significant event
46.
We can appreciate that these ancient rules and laws are clearly not humane, compassionate, or sensible practices in today’s society, or in the context of Jesus’ new law of mystical relational love
47.
Many of these verses need to be completely overhauled or reinterpreted as Jesus explained, imploring the need for urgent change of the interpretation to the ancient laws and rituals of scripture that fall short of the new message of mystical relational love and compassion
48.
Christ Himself totally overhauled and redefined many of the ancient scriptures and replaced them with messages that relate to the invocation of unconditional relational love, compassion and reconciliation to be practiced between all peoples
49.
This imperative message from Christ of unconditional relational love, compassion and reconciliation, is by definition, a message that is universal and timeless and can be expressed and performed by individuals regardless of cultural and religious contexts and which interpretation is immune from the ages and generations including today’s ‘modernity’ and ‘contemporary’ society
50.
This would reduce the Super Natural Being to a Creator and ‘God’ who’s quality of mystical relational love with the created is solely defined in essence by a value that is predicated on the quantity and quality of human ‘goodness’ and/ or ‘badness’
51.
The Creator came into this world to show us the power of interpersonal relational love, compassion and reconciliation
52.
Jesus, a radical and revolutionary divine authority through which God intended to disseminate the essence of His Being of unconditional relational compassion and reconciliation and to provide substantial and unequivocal evidence for the continuation of human immortal life after ‘physical’ death
53.
It was the actual experience of Christ’s life that drove the early Christians to live life with relational love, reconciliation/ forgiveness and compassion, to teach this and then to write and record this about Him
54.
But they did, because perhaps Jesus really did overthrow and revise the rules and laws of the Old Testament which advocates the corporal punishment for ‘sins’, and replaced them with the psychological virtues of relational love, compassion and reconciliation
55.
But rather, teach by the influence of examples of human-to-human unconditional relational love, compassion and reconciliation, manifest as an outcome of Self’s informed consciousness of Self’s thoughts and emotions manifest through Self’s attitudes, values, beliefs and behaviours manifest through the sovereignty and dignity and of Self’s freewill
56.
Yet who also performed the most unbelievable miracles, whilst promoting and teaching knowledge about the higher transcendent qualities and characteristics of compassion, charity, reconciliation and relational love
57.
It could be said, that through the spiritual, emotional and intellectual knowledge and understanding of the life of Jesus, God’s unconditional and universal relational love, compassion, justice and reconciliation can be manifestly expressed in the relational love Self receives when someone cares, values and accepts Self
58.
That the Creator’s unconditional and universal relational love, compassion, reconciliation and justice can be manifestly expressed in the love Self gives to others as defined when Self takes time to understand, value and accept others as unique and special beings
59.
That the Creator’s unconditional and universal relational love, compassion, reconciliation and justice can be manifestly expressed in the love that enables Self to overcome and celebrate the potential barriers and obstacles of intellectual, psychological and spiritual diversity that has the propensity to intellectually, psychologically and spiritually separate human beings from one another
60.
Through the incarnation, humans have received the ‘new law’ of mystical relational love, compassion and reconciliation
61.
This is the practice of real relational love emanating from personal integrity to voluntary choose to act with love towards others and Self, and in so doing, respecting and relating with the Creator and the Christ
62.
The New Law of Relational Love
63.
Live Life with Relational Love for Self and Others
64.
It is a universal truth that these attributes and virtues of the higher transcendent qualities of relational charity, reconciliation and compassion, can provide personal satisfaction in terms of meaning, vision and hope to Self’s life and existence
65.
This is such a powerful commandment or concept and must be considered a wonderfully constructive component of the new law of relational love and compassion
66.
This new divine decree or concept or advice regarding relational love can be defined as putting into practice through self’s constructs of cognition, emotion and behaviour the acts of compassion and reconciliation for Self and others
67.
This new law of Mystical Relational Love is described, emphasised and confirmed, in ‘The Letter to Romans’, which reads:
68.
So with the new law of relational love comes the law of, “not judging
69.
And with the addition of spiritual strength emanating from intuitive reflective spiritual discernment, we can surely carry Self up the gold laden, but steep obstacle ridden path of relational love, hope and charity manifesting in love for Self and neighbour
70.
If the Creator exists and Christ is the Creator/God then Jesus’ mystical relational love is a reflection of God’s mystical relational love and therefore the ultimate epitome of love
71.
Jesus’ examples, teachings and behaviour must be then the personification of pure and perfect mystical relational love
72.
And the cycle of pain through relational destruction can also perpetuate through the threat and reality of ‘physical’, financial and emotional abuse
73.
All human transgressions can be forgiven, cast aside as far as the East is from the West, because of, and by, the Creator’s infinite mystical relational compassion
74.
The general theme of love described throughout the New Testament comes to us in stories of Jesus’ mystical relational love, compassion and reconciliation (forgiveness) for those He lived with, and came into contact with, during His time on Earth
75.
He extended His relational love and compassion to the woman at the Well who had had five husbands and was at the time living with another man in an unmarried state
76.
The ‘God’ or Creator we have explored and possibly discovered this far, must be possibly considered from all the available evidence, a ‘God’ that possesses the attributes and characteristics of an unconditional mystical relational love, mercy and compassion of reconciliation, and not a ‘God’ motivated by revenge, hate and retribution
77.
So where does the reality of the concepts of Hell and Satan fit into the real world and universe? Where does the reality of the concepts of Hell and Satan fit into the spiritual world? How does peoples’ belief in Hell and Satan fit into the story of the unconditional mystical relational love, intelligence and power of a Creator? Hell is described as eternal post-death punishment
78.
To the authors mind the human concepts of Hell and Satan do not, and have never existed, for ‘God’ is Absolute Mystical Relational Love
79.
There may be people who wish to go to a place without the good, a place without the truth, a place without the mystical relational love of the Creator
80.
But if this stubbornness and arrogance exists it can only possibly be conceived as being short term and temporary, until the unconditional mystical relational love, compassion and light of the Creator is experienced, and thus, personally desired and willed by Self though free choice
81.
After Self’s ‘physical’ death previous selfish and inconsiderate behaviours may be now exponentially experienced by Self’s Self, because these past experiences will incongruently contrast strongly with the mystical relational love inherent in the experience of life on the “other side”
82.
The Other Side, a place that amplifies Self’s personal consciousness, for the capacity to acknowledge the true spirit of relational love and compassion over and above a personal spirit of selfishness, meanness and ill will
83.
But based on mystical relational love and understanding as the motivation for voluntary personal change
84.
Through Christ’s life we can perhaps experience the essence and meaning of the words ‘unconditional love’ as a reflection of the mystical relational compassion of the Creator
85.
From this mysterious relational experience between ‘God’ and humans, perhaps we can anticipate ‘God’s being, God’s truth, God’s essence and God’s will in the potentiality of the sacredness and integrity of human independence, freewill and sovereignty that has been bestowed on humankind
86.
We would be unable to exercise the higher transcendent virtues and qualities of goodness through the characteristics of relational love, reconciliation and compassion
87.
This spiritual and relational experience of love sourced through her interpersonal relationship with the perfect love and compassion of Jesus, was the basis upon which she was able to recognize and identify within, a sense of inner peace and joy
88.
From the interaction of Jesus’ mystical relational love, acceptance, compassion and forgiveness for her and all that she outwardly represented to Him, she was able to instill in herself the desire and ability to attain the higher transcendent qualities and virtues required for peaceful living
89.
Perhaps prayer is about meditating and reflecting on life, Self and relational love
90.
Where reflective prayer may enhance Self’s acknowledgment of Self, life and relational love experiences through Self’s personal self-awareness, self-consciousness and sense of responsibility and accountability
91.
Perhaps prayer is about life and about relational love, where living life is about loving and loving is about living life, and where both living life and relational love are constructive because they are about learning about Self
92.
Living life with intra-personal and interpersonal relational love where Self can give Self permission for self-acceptance for Self and others
93.
Imagining, meditating, and reflecting on the mystical relational love of the Creator can give one the strength to change things that one has control over, and come to terms with any changes that may instill anxiety, and help one to accept that which cannot be changed, but which is nevertheless causing grief and consternation
94.
Prayer may constitute living life to its fullest potential, living life in relational acceptance, compassion and reconciliation and living life in interpersonal peace
95.
Human beings who have been created with the incredible capabilities of consciousness, thought, emotion, intellect, personality, spirit and freewill, who have attitudes and values and who experience personally unique thoughts and feelings such as relational love, happiness, sadness, joy and anger, etc
96.
This book is about ‘The Power’ and ‘The Mystical Relational Love’ that we can believe this Super Natural Being possesses if we choose to decide to believe in the existence of such a Being
97.
This book is about the possibility of the existence of a CREATOR, or ‘GOD’, or “That Which Nothing Greater Can Be Thought,” or that which is Omniscient (all knowing), that which is Omnipotent (all powerful), that which is Benevolent (all good), and the fathomless and undying unconditional mystical relational love that such a Creator may and/or must possess
98.
This book is about the possibilities of the existence of a Creator and about how such a Creator may desire, through mystical relational love, to voluntary persuade a change in particular hardened beliefs and attitudes and thus the transformation of particular human transgressions, faults, deficits and indiscretions manifest in maladaptive thoughts, feelings, behaviours and contents of speech
